CD-ROM and Web Based Dangerous Goods Training Programs & Seminars

DGRtraining.com

E-mail


- TDG
- Advantages
- Penalties

FAA Penalties:

 

Web Posted: Feb 4, 2006

FAA Press Releass on Hazmat Penalties 1998-2003 (please note when you click on a new link your browser will be asked to open a new window).

4/28/2003 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Delta Air Lines, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
3/31/2003 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Revlon for Hazmat Violations
3/24/2003 FAA Proposes $72,000 Penalty Against Paul H. Gesswein Co. for Hazmat Violations
3/19/2003 FAA Proposes $72,000 Penalty Against Glaze 'n Seal for Hazmat Violations
3/19/2003 FAA Proposes $75,000 Penalty Against Stevens Aviation for Hazmat Violations
3/18/2003 FAA Proposes $53,550 Penalty Against Avery Dennison Corp. for Hazmat Violations
3/18/2003 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Namco for Hazmat Violations
3/18/2003 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Suitt Construction for Hazmat Violations
3/18/2003 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Arpac Automotive Products for Hazmat Violations
3/18/2003 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Ashland Changzhou and Ashland Specialty Chemical for Hazmat Violations
3/18/2003 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Durability, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
3/18/2003 FAA Proposes $97,500 Penalty Against PerkinElmer for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $220,000 Penalty Against Expert-Med for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $51,000 Penalty Against Nova Chemicals for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $51,000 Penalty Against Tristar Corporation for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $53,550 Penalty Against Coty US for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Alden Rowing Shells, LLC for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Clarus Technologies for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against SimplexGrinnell LP for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Dreamworks SKG for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Aveda Esthetique for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Matarah Industries for Hazmat Violations
2/28/2003 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Honeywell, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
2/03/2003 FAA Proposes $51,000 Penalty Against Hornbeck's LLC for Hazmat Violations
2/03/2003 FAA Proposes $52,500 Penalty Against Eastern Asia Industries for Hazmat Violations
2/03/2003 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against 1st Choice Bowling Supply for Hazmat Violations
2/03/2003 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Lawson Products, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
2/03/2003 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against the Hopper Company, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
2/03/2003 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Queen Nail & Beauty Supplies, Inc for Hazmat Violations
2/03/2003 FAA Proposes $72,000 Penalty Against Daimler Chrysler for Hazmat Violations
2/03/2003 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Road Runner Trailers of Texas, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
1/02/2003 FAA Proposes $52,500 Penalty Against Honeywell, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $51,000 Penalty Against Dad's Auto Dismantling for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $51,000 Penalty Against Superior Solvents, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $51,000 Penalty Against The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $52,500 Penalty Against Kentucky Company for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $52,500 Penalty Against Ohio Company for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $52,500 Penalty Against Tampa Company for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Ohio Company for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against California Company for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Washington D.C. Company for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against American LaFrance for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against South Carolina Company for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Pennsylvania Company for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against West Virginia Corporation for Hazmat Violations
12/13/2002 FAA Proposes $96,250 Penalty Against Barbados Company for Hazmat Violations
10/11/2002 FAA Proposes Fine Against Northwest Airlines for Hazmat Violations
4/29/2002 FAA Seeking $247,500 Civil Penalty Against American Airlines for Shipping Unmarked Oxygen Generator Aboard Fedex
4/29/2002 FAA Seeks $247,500 Civil Penalty Against American Airlines For Shipping Unmarked Oxygen Generator Aboard Fedex
2/08/2002 FAA Proposes $165,000 Penalty Against Merial Select for Hazmat Violations
2/08/2002 FAA Proposes $51,000 Penalty Against Cummins Eastern Canada for Hazmat Violations
2/08/2002 FAA Proposes $63,000 Penalty Against Ecolab for Hazmat Violations
2/08/2002 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Wiginton Fire Sprinklers for Hazmat Violations
2/08/2002 FAA Proposes $95,000 Penalty Against Aerobal SA for Hazmat Violations
2/08/2002 FAA Proposes Civil Penalties Against Cummins Engine Company for Hazmat Violations
1/28/2002 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Sturdisteel Company for Hazmat Violations
12/21/2001 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Sturdisteel Company for Hazmat Violations
12/21/2001 FAA Proposes $72,000 Penalty Against Alpa International for Hazmat Violations
12/14/2001 FAA Proposes $51,000 Penalty Against Eagle Family Foods for Hazmat Violations
12/14/2001 FAA Proposes $51,000 Penalty Against MSC/Industrial Supply for Hazmat Violations
12/14/2001 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against 84 Lumber Company for Hazmat Violations
12/14/2001 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Aroma Trading for Hazmat Violations
11/26/2001 FAA Proposes $72,000 Fine Against Deere & Company for Hazmat Violations
8/19/2001 FAA Proposes $78,500 Fine Against Novel Tees Wholesale
7/23/2001 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Dental Supply Company for Hazmat Violations
7/23/2001 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Emco Chemical Distributors for Hazmat Violations
7/23/2001 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against John Deere for Hazmat Violations
7/17/2001 FAA Proposes $52,500 Penalty Against Oklahoma City Company for Hazmat Violations
7/17/2001 FAA Proposes $52,500 Penalty Against Rex Pegg Fabrics, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
7/17/2001 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against DTI for Hazmat Violations
7/17/2001 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Illinois Company for Hazmat Violations
7/17/2001 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Lebermuth Co. for Hazmat Violations
7/17/2001 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Bindley Western Industries for Hazmat Violations
7/17/2001 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Indianapolis Company for Hazmat Violations
7/17/2001 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Scotty's, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
7/16/2001 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Georgia Company for Hazmat Violations
6/05/2001 FAA Proposes $72,000 Penalty Against Houston Company for Hazmat Violations
5/01/2001 FAA Proposes $80,000 Penalty Against Aviation Management Systems for Hazmat Violations
5/01/2001 FAA Proposes $80,000 Penalty against Aviation Management Systems for Hazmat violations
4/11/2001 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against California Company for Hazmat Violations
4/11/2001 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Home Depot for Hazmat Violations
4/11/2001 FAA Proposes $82,500 Penalty Against Little Rock Company for Hazmat Violations
4/04/2001 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty Against Daimler Chrysler for Hazmat Violations
2/08/2001 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Kubota Tractor Corp. for Hazmat Violations
2/08/2001 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Division of Monsanto Corp. for Hazmat Violations
2/08/2001 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Texas Company for Hazmat Violations
12/28/2000 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty Against Homero Prida Bravo for Hazmat Violations
12/28/2000 FAA Proposes $54,000 Penalty Against Massachusetts Company for Hazmat Violations
12/28/2000 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against California Company for Hazmat Violations
12/28/2000 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Sears, Roebuck & Co. for Hazmat Violations
12/28/2000 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Starwest Pharmaceuticals for Hazmat Violations
12/28/2000 FAA Proposes $72,000 Penalty Against Luxembourg Company for Hazmat Violations
12/28/2000 FAA Proposes $82,500 Penalty Against French Company for Hazmat Violations
11/03/2000 FAA Proposes $55,000 Penalty Against CalAmerica for Hazmat Violations
11/03/2000 FAA Proposes $76,000 Penalty Against Walgreen Co. for Hazmat Violations
11/03/2000 FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Furniture Medic for Hazmat Violations
11/01/2000 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty Against Tampa Airlines for Hazmat Violations
11/01/2000 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Environ Corp. for Hazmat Violation
9/27/2000 FAA Proposes $90,000 Fine Against Kalyna International Trading Corp.
9/20/2000 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty against Hsin Huey Enterprise for Hazmat violations
8/04/2000 FAA Proposes $52,500 Penalty Against Indianapolis Company for Hazmat Violations
8/04/2000 FAA Proposes $54,000 Penalty Against French Company for Hazmat Violations
8/02/2000 FAA Proposes $165,000 Penalty Against FedEx for Hazmat Violations
8/02/2000 FAA Proposes $54,000 Penalty Against Minnesota Firm for Hazmat Violations
8/02/2000 FAA Proposes $72,000 Penalty Against Xerox for Hazmat Violations
8/02/2000 FAA Proposes $80,000 Penalty Against Roy F. Weston, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
7/31/2000 FAA Issues Correction on Hazmat Civil Penalty
7/25/2000 Federal Aviation Administration Proposes $50,000 Hazmat Civil Penalty Against Montroy Supply
7/25/2000 Federal Aviation Administration Proposes $50,000 Hazmat Civil Penalty Against Montroy Supply
7/21/2000 FAA Proposes $57,000 Penalty Against Jergens Company for Hazmat Violations
7/11/2000 FAA Proposes $133,000 Civil Penalty for Company Attempting to Ship Hazardous Materials Aboard Aircraft
7/11/2000 FAA Proposes $133,000 Civil Penalty for Company Attempting to Ship Hazardous Materials Aboard Aircraft
6/21/2000 FAA Proposes $165,000 Penalty Against Chilean Company for Hazmat Violations
6/21/2000 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Home Depot for Hazmat Violations
6/02/2000 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Daytona Beach Company for Hazmat Violations
6/02/2000 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Illinois Company for Hazmat Violations
5/26/2000 FAA Proposes $70,000 Civil Penalty Against Southwest Airlines for Hazmat Violations
5/26/2000 Faa Proposes $70,000 Civil Penalty Against Southwest Airlines for Hazmat Violations
5/22/2000 FAA Proposes $50,000 Civil Penalty for Violation of Hazmat Regulations
5/22/2000 FAA Proposes $50,000 Civil Penalty for Violation of Hazmat Regulations
5/12/2000 FAA PROPOSES $53,000 HAZMAT FINE AGAINST AMERICAN INGREDIENTS COMPANY
4/21/2000 FAA Proposes $52,000 penalty Against California Company for Hazmat Violations
4/20/2000 FAA Proposes $192,500 Penalty Against Valvoline for Hazmat Violations
4/20/2000 FAA Proposes $440,000 Penalty Against VASP for Hazmat Violations
4/20/2000 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Miami Cargo Company for Hazmat Violations
3/21/2000 FAA PROPOSES $70,000 HAZMAT FINE AGAINST SUMMERSET PRODUCTS, INC.
3/21/2000 FAA PROPOSES $860,000 HAZMAT FINE AGAINST TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA
3/21/2000 FAA PROPOSES $90,000 HAZMAT FINE AGAINST SUPERIOR FOAM DIVISION, KOALA CORPORATION
3/20/2000 FAA Proposes $66,000 Penalty Against Texas Company for Hazmat Violations
3/13/2000 FAA Proposes $54,000 Penalty Against Georgia Company for Hazmat Violations
3/13/2000 FAA Proposes $54,000 Penalty Against Washington Company for Hazmat Violations
3/13/2000 FAA Proposes $95,000 Penalty Against Mississippi Company for Hazmat Violations
12/10/1999 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty Against Florida Company for Hazmat Violations
12/10/1999 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty Against Miami Company for Hazmat Violations
11/02/1999 FAA Proposes $165,000 Penalty Against California Company for Hazmat Violations
10/29/1999 FAA Proposes $57,000 Penalty Against Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
10/29/1999 FAA Proposes $80,000 Penalty Against Malibu Grand Prix for Hazmat Violations
10/28/1999 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against OKI Bering for Hazmat Violations
10/20/1999 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty Against New Jersey Company for Hazmat Violations
10/20/1999 FAA Proposes $55,000 Penalty Against Canadian Company for Hazmat Violations
10/20/1999 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Turbodyne Systems, Inc. for Hazmat Violations
10/20/1999 FAA Proposes $62,000 Penalty Against Seattle Company for Hazmat Violations
9/13/1999 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty Against California Company for Hazmat Violations
9/13/1999 FAA Proposes $52,500 Penalty Against New Jersey Company for Hazmat Violations
9/13/1999 FAA Proposes $54,000 Penalty Against Mississippi Company for Hazmat Violations
9/13/1999 FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Baranco Acura for Hazmat Violations
9/13/1999 FAA Proposes $60,000 Penalty Against Kentucky Company for Hazmat Violations
9/13/1999 FAA Proposes $62,000 Penalty Against Canadian Company for Hazmat Violations
9/13/1999 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Texas Company for Hazmat Violations
9/13/1999 FAA Proposes $75,000 Penalty Against New York Company for Hazmat Violations
9/13/1999 FAA Proposes $77,000 Penalty Against South Dakota Company for Hazmat Violations
7/30/1999 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty Against Georgia Company for Hazmat Violations
7/30/1999 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Texas Company for Hazmat Violations
7/30/1999 FAA Proposes $87,500 Penalty Against Swedish Company for Hazmat Violations
7/16/1999 FAA Proposes $65,000 Penalty Against Seattle Company for Hazmat Violations
7/15/1999 FAA Proposes $50,000 Penalty Against Alabama Company for Hazmat Violations
7/08/1999 FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against California Company for Hazmat Violations
7/08/1999 FAA Proposes $80,000 Penalty Against Santa Ana Company for Hazmat Violations
7/08/1999 FAA Proposes $85,000 Penalty Against Chicago Company for Hazmat Violations
7/08/1999 FAA Proposes $99,000 Penalty Against Amerijet International for Hazmat Violations
6/24/1999 FAA Proposes $909,000 in Fines for Hazmat Violations
6/11/1999 FAA Seeks to Assess $52,500 Civil Penalty Against Illinois Firm in Hazmat Shipment
6/01/1999 FAA Proposes $82,500 Fine Against American Airlines for Hazmat Violations
5/25/1999 FAA Proposes $75,000 Fine Against Allison Engine Company for Hazmat Violations
3/29/1999 FAA Seeks to Assess $65,000 Civil Penalty Against Chicago Firm in Hazmat Shipments
3/26/1999 FAA Proposes $60,000 in Penalties for Hazmat Violations
12/18/1998 FAA Proposes $1.3 Million in Civil Penalties For Hazmat Violations
10/23/1998 FAA Proposes $75,000 Civil Penalty Against Sally Beauty Co., Denton, TX, in Hazmat Case
8/19/1998 FAA Proposes $400,000 in Penalties For Hazmat Violations
6/25/1998 FAA Proposes $260,000 in Penalties for Hazmat Violations
3/03/1998 FAA Proposes $80,000 Civil Penalty Against Texas Firm in Hazmat Case
3/03/1998 FAA Proposes $90,000 Civil Penalty in Southwest Airlines Hazmat Case

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
800 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20591
1-866-TELL-FAA (1-866-835-5322)

 

...
FAA Proposes $53,550 Penalty Against Avery Dennison Corp. for Hazmat Violations

FAA Proposes $59,500 Penalty Against Namco for Hazmat Violations

FAA Proposes $70,000 Penalty Against Suitt Construction for Hazmat Violations

FAA Proposes $75,000 Penalty Against Stevens Aviation for Hazmat Violations

FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Arpac Automotive Products for Hazmat Violations

FAA Proposes $84,000 Penalty Against Ashland Changzhou and Ashland Specialty Chemical for Hazmat Violations

HazardousMaterials Requirements for Consumer Commodities FAQ



DG Training Disc
 

FAQFrequently Asked Questions


home - products - services - about us - faq - site map - contact